<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: I Hate You, I Love You</title>
	<atom:link href="http://stuntbox.com/blog/2007/10/i-hate-you-i-love-you/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://stuntbox.com/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&amp;feed=Articles+%28RSS2%29&amp;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fstuntbox.com%2Fblog%2F2007%2F10%2Fi-hate-you-i-love-you%2F&amp;seed_title=I+Hate+You%2C+I+Love+You</link>
	<description>David Sleight&#039;s Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 15:23:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Tracy</title>
		<link>http://stuntbox.com/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&amp;feed=Articles+%28RSS2%29&amp;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fstuntbox.com%2Fblog%2F2007%2F10%2Fi-hate-you-i-love-you%2F&amp;seed_title=I+Hate+You%2C+I+Love+You/comment-page-1/#comment-7656</link>
		<dc:creator>Tracy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2007 19:11:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stuntbox.com/blog/2007/10/i-hate-you-i-love-you/#comment-7656</guid>
		<description>This thought made me smile, as I&#039;m in the middle of weathering this very thing right now. Thanks for the reminder. It&#039;s true the negatives become constructive after awhile and that is a good thing. I find also that some of the negative&#039;s just need to live with change for a bit before they accept new things - hence the initial reactionary response.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This thought made me smile, as I&#8217;m in the middle of weathering this very thing right now. Thanks for the reminder. It&#8217;s true the negatives become constructive after awhile and that is a good thing. I find also that some of the negative&#8217;s just need to live with change for a bit before they accept new things &#8211; hence the initial reactionary response.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Sleight</title>
		<link>http://stuntbox.com/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&amp;feed=Articles+%28RSS2%29&amp;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fstuntbox.com%2Fblog%2F2007%2F10%2Fi-hate-you-i-love-you%2F&amp;seed_title=I+Hate+You%2C+I+Love+You/comment-page-1/#comment-6619</link>
		<dc:creator>David Sleight</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2007 04:42:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stuntbox.com/blog/2007/10/i-hate-you-i-love-you/#comment-6619</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.stuntbox.com/blog/2007/10/i-hate-you-i-love-you/#comment-6583&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;David&lt;/a&gt;: To be clear, I&#039;m talking about a major redesign of a large-scale product. Human nature being what it is, I think the spike is quite common. Even with products recognized over time as superior by audiences. Peoples is peoples, and sometimes peoples are pretty darn reactionary. 

Actually, when I &lt;em&gt;don&#039;t&lt;/em&gt; see the initial negative spike on The Big Launch I worry way more. Silence from the most vocal contingent of your audience is dreadful ominous.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.stuntbox.com/blog/2007/10/i-hate-you-i-love-you/#comment-6583" rel="nofollow">David</a>: To be clear, I&#8217;m talking about a major redesign of a large-scale product. Human nature being what it is, I think the spike is quite common. Even with products recognized over time as superior by audiences. Peoples is peoples, and sometimes peoples are pretty darn reactionary. </p>
<p>Actually, when I <em>don&#8217;t</em> see the initial negative spike on The Big Launch I worry way more. Silence from the most vocal contingent of your audience is dreadful ominous.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://stuntbox.com/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&amp;feed=Articles+%28RSS2%29&amp;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fstuntbox.com%2Fblog%2F2007%2F10%2Fi-hate-you-i-love-you%2F&amp;seed_title=I+Hate+You%2C+I+Love+You/comment-page-1/#comment-6583</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2007 20:43:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stuntbox.com/blog/2007/10/i-hate-you-i-love-you/#comment-6583</guid>
		<description>Interesting read, but not too sure on the graphical representation you have there. if you get that level of negative feed back out the gate, its usually cause you actually have done something wrong or shockingly upfamiliar. If every single job you do gets this type of waved feedback, I&#039;d say sit down and actually rethink your solution. Unless i have simply had a good life that negative wave should be about half  that size coming out the gate.

i do agree that the positive comments generally come in slowly, but thats natural because you are introducing something new. usually,like you mentioned, the negative critiques do get less emotional and become constructive and needed, so do pay attention to them as they will most often lead you in the right direction, once the now &quot;teh sux&quot; (lol) people leave.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting read, but not too sure on the graphical representation you have there. if you get that level of negative feed back out the gate, its usually cause you actually have done something wrong or shockingly upfamiliar. If every single job you do gets this type of waved feedback, I&#8217;d say sit down and actually rethink your solution. Unless i have simply had a good life that negative wave should be about half  that size coming out the gate.</p>
<p>i do agree that the positive comments generally come in slowly, but thats natural because you are introducing something new. usually,like you mentioned, the negative critiques do get less emotional and become constructive and needed, so do pay attention to them as they will most often lead you in the right direction, once the now &#8220;teh sux&#8221; (lol) people leave.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Sleight</title>
		<link>http://stuntbox.com/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&amp;feed=Articles+%28RSS2%29&amp;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fstuntbox.com%2Fblog%2F2007%2F10%2Fi-hate-you-i-love-you%2F&amp;seed_title=I+Hate+You%2C+I+Love+You/comment-page-1/#comment-6455</link>
		<dc:creator>David Sleight</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2007 18:40:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stuntbox.com/blog/2007/10/i-hate-you-i-love-you/#comment-6455</guid>
		<description>Thanks. My guess is that many experienced designers intuit this already. But I still run into folks who don&#039;t steel themselves for it and get a little thrown post-launch by the initial reactionary fits.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks. My guess is that many experienced designers intuit this already. But I still run into folks who don&#8217;t steel themselves for it and get a little thrown post-launch by the initial reactionary fits.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zeldman</title>
		<link>http://stuntbox.com/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&amp;feed=Articles+%28RSS2%29&amp;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fstuntbox.com%2Fblog%2F2007%2F10%2Fi-hate-you-i-love-you%2F&amp;seed_title=I+Hate+You%2C+I+Love+You/comment-page-1/#comment-6450</link>
		<dc:creator>Zeldman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2007 12:56:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stuntbox.com/blog/2007/10/i-hate-you-i-love-you/#comment-6450</guid>
		<description>beautifully put and rings true.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>beautifully put and rings true.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
