<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Other New BusinessWeek</title>
	<atom:link href="http://stuntbox.com/blog/2007/10/the-other-new-businessweek/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://stuntbox.com/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&amp;feed=Articles+%28RSS2%29&amp;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fstuntbox.com%2Fblog%2F2007%2F10%2Fthe-other-new-businessweek%2F&amp;seed_title=The+Other+New+BusinessWeek</link>
	<description>David Sleight&#039;s Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 23:03:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Business Week Redesign at //nedward.org</title>
		<link>http://stuntbox.com/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&amp;feed=Articles+%28RSS2%29&amp;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fstuntbox.com%2Fblog%2F2007%2F10%2Fthe-other-new-businessweek%2F&amp;seed_title=The+Other+New+BusinessWeek/comment-page-1/#comment-15293</link>
		<dc:creator>Business Week Redesign at //nedward.org</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2008 00:41:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stuntbox.com/blog/2007/10/the-other-new-businessweek/#comment-15293</guid>
		<description>[...] David Sleight takes a look at the typography behind the redesign.       ¶ October 16, 2007 in design and media  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] David Sleight takes a look at the typography behind the redesign.       ¶ October 16, 2007 in design and media  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ChoowsCip</title>
		<link>http://stuntbox.com/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&amp;feed=Articles+%28RSS2%29&amp;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fstuntbox.com%2Fblog%2F2007%2F10%2Fthe-other-new-businessweek%2F&amp;seed_title=The+Other+New+BusinessWeek/comment-page-1/#comment-14590</link>
		<dc:creator>ChoowsCip</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2008 21:54:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stuntbox.com/blog/2007/10/the-other-new-businessweek/#comment-14590</guid>
		<description>wow :) 
its very unconventional point of view. 
Good post. 
realy good post 
 
thx :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>wow :)<br />
its very unconventional point of view.<br />
Good post.<br />
realy good post </p>
<p>thx :-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KarEncarp</title>
		<link>http://stuntbox.com/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&amp;feed=Articles+%28RSS2%29&amp;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fstuntbox.com%2Fblog%2F2007%2F10%2Fthe-other-new-businessweek%2F&amp;seed_title=The+Other+New+BusinessWeek/comment-page-1/#comment-12606</link>
		<dc:creator>KarEncarp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 03:09:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stuntbox.com/blog/2007/10/the-other-new-businessweek/#comment-12606</guid>
		<description>Thanks authors for the specified materials, a lot of the compelling advice. All good.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks authors for the specified materials, a lot of the compelling advice. All good.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Sleight</title>
		<link>http://stuntbox.com/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&amp;feed=Articles+%28RSS2%29&amp;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fstuntbox.com%2Fblog%2F2007%2F10%2Fthe-other-new-businessweek%2F&amp;seed_title=The+Other+New+BusinessWeek/comment-page-1/#comment-9666</link>
		<dc:creator>David Sleight</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 18:52:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stuntbox.com/blog/2007/10/the-other-new-businessweek/#comment-9666</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.stuntbox.com/blog/2007/10/the-other-new-businessweek/#comment-9660&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;@John&lt;/a&gt;: Thanks much. Glad you enjoyed it. Yes, the template for this site is 100% my own blood, sweat and tears&#8212;we aim to please!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.stuntbox.com/blog/2007/10/the-other-new-businessweek/#comment-9660" rel="nofollow">@John</a>: Thanks much. Glad you enjoyed it. Yes, the template for this site is 100% my own blood, sweat and tears&#8212;we aim to please!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Svid</title>
		<link>http://stuntbox.com/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&amp;feed=Articles+%28RSS2%29&amp;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fstuntbox.com%2Fblog%2F2007%2F10%2Fthe-other-new-businessweek%2F&amp;seed_title=The+Other+New+BusinessWeek/comment-page-1/#comment-9660</link>
		<dc:creator>John Svid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 18:15:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stuntbox.com/blog/2007/10/the-other-new-businessweek/#comment-9660</guid>
		<description>Wow great site! Some really helpful information there. 
I’m sorry for little off-topic, but I want to ask you about design of this site. 
Did you make this template yourself or got from any templates website? 
Looks pretty cool for me. Wonderful well this reading.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow great site! Some really helpful information there.<br />
I’m sorry for little off-topic, but I want to ask you about design of this site.<br />
Did you make this template yourself or got from any templates website?<br />
Looks pretty cool for me. Wonderful well this reading.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Sleight</title>
		<link>http://stuntbox.com/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&amp;feed=Articles+%28RSS2%29&amp;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fstuntbox.com%2Fblog%2F2007%2F10%2Fthe-other-new-businessweek%2F&amp;seed_title=The+Other+New+BusinessWeek/comment-page-1/#comment-9651</link>
		<dc:creator>David Sleight</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 14:56:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stuntbox.com/blog/2007/10/the-other-new-businessweek/#comment-9651</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.stuntbox.com/blog/2007/10/the-other-new-businessweek/#comment-9579&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;@Joe&lt;/a&gt;: No, I can&#039;t say that there was any substantive shift in the actual content that I&#039;m aware of. Sections of the magazine were physically reorganized to make better navigational sense. For example, columnists are now grouped together instead if being split to the front and back of the book.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.stuntbox.com/blog/2007/10/the-other-new-businessweek/#comment-9579" rel="nofollow">@Joe</a>: No, I can&#8217;t say that there was any substantive shift in the actual content that I&#8217;m aware of. Sections of the magazine were physically reorganized to make better navigational sense. For example, columnists are now grouped together instead if being split to the front and back of the book.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe</title>
		<link>http://stuntbox.com/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&amp;feed=Articles+%28RSS2%29&amp;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fstuntbox.com%2Fblog%2F2007%2F10%2Fthe-other-new-businessweek%2F&amp;seed_title=The+Other+New+BusinessWeek/comment-page-1/#comment-9579</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 08:09:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stuntbox.com/blog/2007/10/the-other-new-businessweek/#comment-9579</guid>
		<description>The new format sucks. I&#039;ve been subscribing to businessweek for 10 years now.  I always loved the magazine for its straightforward content and analysis.  I can&#039;t put my finger on what it is - did businessweek coincidentally shift their content focus with this design? Or does the new design limit the content? Either way I do not like the new mag and am now a reader of its website.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The new format sucks. I&#8217;ve been subscribing to businessweek for 10 years now.  I always loved the magazine for its straightforward content and analysis.  I can&#8217;t put my finger on what it is &#8211; did businessweek coincidentally shift their content focus with this design? Or does the new design limit the content? Either way I do not like the new mag and am now a reader of its website.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Alland</title>
		<link>http://stuntbox.com/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&amp;feed=Articles+%28RSS2%29&amp;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fstuntbox.com%2Fblog%2F2007%2F10%2Fthe-other-new-businessweek%2F&amp;seed_title=The+Other+New+BusinessWeek/comment-page-1/#comment-6781</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Alland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2007 14:21:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stuntbox.com/blog/2007/10/the-other-new-businessweek/#comment-6781</guid>
		<description>I think it&#039;s overall a better logo, Looks less cluttered - however the original design had a timeless quality to it - the new one has a contemporary feel - however the magazine seems more contemporary, not  an old school business magazine - so it makes sense to update the logo accordingly. Feels cleaner yes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it&#8217;s overall a better logo, Looks less cluttered &#8211; however the original design had a timeless quality to it &#8211; the new one has a contemporary feel &#8211; however the magazine seems more contemporary, not  an old school business magazine &#8211; so it makes sense to update the logo accordingly. Feels cleaner yes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Sleight</title>
		<link>http://stuntbox.com/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&amp;feed=Articles+%28RSS2%29&amp;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fstuntbox.com%2Fblog%2F2007%2F10%2Fthe-other-new-businessweek%2F&amp;seed_title=The+Other+New+BusinessWeek/comment-page-1/#comment-6517</link>
		<dc:creator>David Sleight</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Oct 2007 17:37:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stuntbox.com/blog/2007/10/the-other-new-businessweek/#comment-6517</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.stuntbox.com/blog/2007/10/the-other-new-businessweek/#comment-6512&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;@David&lt;/a&gt;: What in particular are you fighting with? Typography? Layout? Colors? Some interaction of all three? Can you site a specific page that you find particularly difficult to deal with? While sending a &quot;nastygram&quot; might make you feel better for a moment, it isn&#039;t constructive because it doesn&#039;t tell us anything beyond simple distaste.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.stuntbox.com/blog/2007/10/the-other-new-businessweek/#comment-6512" rel="nofollow">@David</a>: What in particular are you fighting with? Typography? Layout? Colors? Some interaction of all three? Can you site a specific page that you find particularly difficult to deal with? While sending a &#8220;nastygram&#8221; might make you feel better for a moment, it isn&#8217;t constructive because it doesn&#8217;t tell us anything beyond simple distaste.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Brassard</title>
		<link>http://stuntbox.com/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&amp;feed=Articles+%28RSS2%29&amp;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fstuntbox.com%2Fblog%2F2007%2F10%2Fthe-other-new-businessweek%2F&amp;seed_title=The+Other+New+BusinessWeek/comment-page-1/#comment-6512</link>
		<dc:creator>David Brassard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Oct 2007 15:10:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stuntbox.com/blog/2007/10/the-other-new-businessweek/#comment-6512</guid>
		<description>Count me as one who immensely hates the new &quot;design&quot;.I had to fight with me &quot;eye&quot; to read the new format.I sent a nastygram to the editor-in-chief and cancelled my subscription.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Count me as one who immensely hates the new &#8220;design&#8221;.I had to fight with me &#8220;eye&#8221; to read the new format.I sent a nastygram to the editor-in-chief and cancelled my subscription.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
